- #KEIL 5 FRAMEWORK CUBEMX.PDSC IS MISSING HOW TO#
- #KEIL 5 FRAMEWORK CUBEMX.PDSC IS MISSING DRIVER#
- #KEIL 5 FRAMEWORK CUBEMX.PDSC IS MISSING CODE#
Needless to say, you don't need to go this route.
#KEIL 5 FRAMEWORK CUBEMX.PDSC IS MISSING HOW TO#
You are still exposed to all ugly internal details, but added with an extra layer of complexity how to control these partially-exposed low-level details through elaborate higher-level details - which are very buggy as well. But, the fact is that all implementations I've seen to provide this generic abstaction on STM32 are totally failed beyond unusable, most notably the STM32 HAL and Standard Peripheral Library. But now, you have a much more capable and powerful MCU which can do anything you want (and there probably is a reason why you picked a more powerful ARM instead of the AVR or PIC), but instead, you are led to fear that it's "too complex to understand", necessitating "abstraction". And I understand people want to use integrated tools and as much libraries as possible to make the same experience happen on STM32. And it really works easily with simple digitalWrite(). I understand the Arduino way of hiding ugly things like #includes to make it easier to just blink a LED for an artist/beginner, using about two lines of code. We just need to admit ourselves this is totally unsustainable and stop doing that. Projects are autogenerated without any clue what's happening on the background.
#KEIL 5 FRAMEWORK CUBEMX.PDSC IS MISSING CODE#
The coding style taught using these libraries and toolsets is pure horror - typically 20-30 lines of code is either copypasted or autogenerated to change an IO pin as an output and turn an LED on. It's not about how to get started - it's should be about how to do something useful, in a sustainable manner. I have seen very little success doing anything actually - but countless of threads like this, asking "how to get started". 5 times? During this time, I have seen people come and go, always instructing beginners to learn a different toolset each year, then these toolsets get obsolete or simply non-trendy after a few succesful LED blinker projects. Note, not all clock freq are possible and sometime it is dictated by one of the peripherals eg the USB peripheral must have the PLL clock set to certain freq.ĭuring the 5 years I have spent with STM32 series, the "trend tool of the year", and the supposedly "correct way of doing things" has changed about. You define the clock speed you want and the crystal clock speed and the library code works out what the values should be to put into the PLL registers. It has been 5 years since I have worked with STM32s, I now work on Infineon ARMs I did not have much problems with the internal PLL clocks with the peripheral library, there are 2 defines in a header file somewhere. Edit: I believe yes it is used in industry now, ST no longer support the peripheral library so companies have no choice but to use the ST CUBE. Some of the ST peripherals are difficult to understand from the programmers reference manual, they have application notes for guiding you through using the peripheral for certain application eg timer modual for pwm.
#KEIL 5 FRAMEWORK CUBEMX.PDSC IS MISSING DRIVER#
It is up to you the developer to put a HAL layer on top of the driver code. NONE of the library or cube code is a Hardware Abstraction Layer, it is simpley driver code for the ST peripherals. This is because they replaced it with the ST CUBE which generates the code that the library code use to be. ST no longer support the standard peripheral library, ie they no long do bug fixes or answer questions or do new versions.
0 kommentar(er)
